User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?

Recent Topics

First medical marijuana school in Nevada opens by zigdog
April 14, 2013, 05:17:09 PM

Ron Paul: The Fed and Congress Must Return to Fiscal and Monetary Sanity by zigdog
April 14, 2013, 05:11:01 PM

Ron Paul: Let’s Not Over-React to North Korean Saber Rattling by zigdog
April 14, 2013, 05:01:31 PM

Nostradamus 2012 and the End Of The World by Ace68
April 04, 2013, 03:10:12 AM

Medicinal marijuana bill headed for governor's signature by zigdog
April 02, 2013, 02:27:38 PM

Colorado may set limits for driving after marijuana use by zigdog
April 02, 2013, 02:21:19 PM

Rand Paul’s important concession on guns by zigdog
March 30, 2013, 10:59:57 PM

Rand Paul takes a stand for the Second Amendment by zigdog
March 30, 2013, 10:48:24 PM

In Kentucky, Rand Paul Demonstrates the Art of the Sale by zigdog
March 30, 2013, 10:43:00 PM

Rand Paul And Marco Rubio Promise To Filibuster Obama’s Gun Ban Agenda by zigdog
March 30, 2013, 10:31:29 PM

Author Topic: Humans and Neanderthals 'didn't breed'  (Read 144 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline zigdog

  • Root Admin
  • JetStream Addict
  • ************
  • Posts: 1033
  • Karma: +3/-0
Humans and Neanderthals 'didn't breed'
« on: August 16, 2012, 01:09:20 PM »
Humans and Neanderthals 'didn't breed'


Anthropologists have dealt a blow to theories that Homo sapiens and Neanderthals interbred, bequeathing humans today with some of the genetic legacy of their mysterious cousins.

Over the last two years, several studies have suggested that H. sapiens got it on with Neanderthals, an enigmatic hominid who lived in parts of Europe, Central Asia and the Middle East for up to 300,000 years but vanished some 30-40,000 years ago.

The evidence for this comes from fossil DNA, which shows that on average Eurasians and Asians share between one and four percent of their DNA with Neanderthals, but Africans almost none.

But a new study by scientists at Britain's University of Cambridge says the shared DNA came from a shared ancestor, not from "hybridisation" or reproduction between the two hominid species.

Reporting on Monday in the US journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), Andrea Manica and Anders Eriksson at the university's Evolutionary Ecology Group devised a computer model to simulate a genetic odyssey.

It begins with a common ancestors of Neanderthals and H. sapiens who lived around half a million years ago in parts of Africa and Europe.

Around 300,000-350,000 years ago, the European population and the African population of this hominid became separated.

Living in genetic isolation, the European range evolved bit by bit into Neanderthals, while the African range eventually became H. sapiens, which expanded in waves out of Africa from around 60,000-70,000 years ago.

Communities of H. sapiens that were geographically closer to Europe -- possibly in North Africa -- retained a relatively larger share of the ancestral genes, according to the theory.

They also became the first colonisers of Eurasia during the progressive "Out of Africa" migration.

This could explain why modern-day Europeans and Asians but not Africans have the tiny bit of genetic similarity with Neanderthals.

"Our work shows clearly that the patterns currently seen in the Neanderthal genome are not exceptional, and are in line with our expectations of what we would see without hybridisation," Manica said in a press release.

http://news.yahoo.com/humans-neanderthals-didnt-breed-155325773.html

JETSTREAMNEWS

Humans and Neanderthals 'didn't breed'
« on: August 16, 2012, 01:09:20 PM »

 

Powered by EzPortal